IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v7y2019i1p16n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Entry of Randomized Assignment into the Social Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Jamison Julian C.

    (Department of Economics, 102002University of Exeter Business School, Exeter, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Although the concept of randomized assignment in order to control for extraneous confounding factors reaches back hundreds of years, the first empirical use appears to have been in an 1835 trial of homeopathic medicine. Throughout the 19th century there was a growing awareness of the need for comparison groups, albeit often without the realization that randomization could be a clean method to achieve that goal. In the second and more crucial phase of this history, four separate but related disciplines introduced randomized control trials within a few years of one another in the 1920s: agricultural science; clinical medicine; educational psychology; and social policy (specifically political science). This brought increasing rigor to fields that were focusing more on causal relationships. In a third phase, the 1950s through 1970s saw a surge of interest in more applied randomized experiments in economics and elsewhere – both in the lab and especially in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamison Julian C., 2019. "The Entry of Randomized Assignment into the Social Sciences," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:16:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2017-0025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2017-0025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2017-0025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:16:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.