IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v10y2022i1p18-44n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decomposition of the total effect for two mediators: A natural mediated interaction effect framework

Author

Listed:
  • Gao Xin
  • Li Li

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA)

  • Luo Li

    (Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA)

Abstract

Mediation analysis has been used in many disciplines to explain the mechanism or process that underlies an observed relationship between an exposure variable and an outcome variable via the inclusion of mediators. Decompositions of the total effect (TE) of an exposure variable into effects characterizing mediation pathways and interactions have gained an increasing amount of interest in the last decade. In this work, we develop decompositions for scenarios where two mediators are causally sequential or non-sequential. Current developments in this area have primarily focused on either decompositions without interaction components or with interactions but assuming no causally sequential order between the mediators. We propose a new concept called natural mediated interaction (MI) effect that captures the two-way and three-way interactions for both scenarios and extends the two-way MIs in the literature. We develop a unified approach for decomposing the TE into the effects that are due to mediation only, interaction only, both mediation and interaction, neither mediation nor interaction within the counterfactual framework. Finally, we compare our proposed decomposition to an existing method in a non-sequential two-mediator scenario using simulated data, and illustrate the proposed decomposition for a sequential two-mediator scenario using a real data analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao Xin & Li Li & Luo Li, 2022. "Decomposition of the total effect for two mediators: A natural mediated interaction effect framework," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 18-44, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:18-44:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2020-0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2020-0017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2020-0017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:18-44:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.