IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v35y2026i2p205-223n1007.html

Der 12 Euro-Mindestlohnschock, flüchtige Kipppunkte und der Denkstilzwang

Author

Listed:
  • Heise Arne

    (Universität Hamburg, Professur für Volkswirtschaftslehre, insbesondere Finanzwissenschaft und Public Governance, Welckerstraße 8, 20354 Hamburg, Deutschland)

Abstract

Before the introduction of a nationwide minimum wage in Germany in 2015, there was broad consensus within labor economics that this ‘social experiment’ would inevitably lead to substantial job losses. However, the accompanying research was unable to confirm the predicted decline in employment and had to concede – as in other countries with minimum wage regulations – the ‘elusiveness of employment effects’. This article traces the debate surrounding the introduction of the minimum wage and analyzes how the academic community responded to the divergence between actual employment developments and model-based forecasts – a phenomenon that, from the perspective of the philosophy of science, can be understood as an ‘anomaly’ or even a ‘crisis’. The analysis draws on Fleck’s theory of thought styles and distinguishes between two phases: the introduction of the minimum wage in 2015 and its sharp increase in 2022. This distinction makes it possible to examine both learning processes within economic research and the resilience of a dominant paradigm.

Suggested Citation

  • Heise Arne, 2026. "Der 12 Euro-Mindestlohnschock, flüchtige Kipppunkte und der Denkstilzwang," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 35(2), pages 205-223.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:205-223:n:1007
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2026-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2026-0011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2026-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:205-223:n:1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.