IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v34y2025i1-2p161-181n1009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transdisziplinarität in der BMBF-geförderten Arbeitsforschung: Eine Reflexion methodologischer Potenziale und Herausforderungen

Author

Listed:
  • Nuske Jessica

    (Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft, Universität Bremen, Wiener Str. 9, 28359 Bremen Deutschland)

  • Becke Guido

    (Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft, Universität Bremen, Wiener Str. 9, 28359 Bremen Deutschland)

  • Bleses Peter

    (Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft, Universität Bremen, Wiener Str. 9, 28359 Bremen Deutschland)

Abstract

The BMBF-funded labour studies are distinguished by their transdisciplinary approach, emphasising close collaboration with practitioners. However, the production of transdisciplinary knowledge is a highly intricate and consequently challenging process. Whether the methodological requirements of transdisciplinary research strategies can be met within established funding structures has yet to be adequately addressed. This article addresses this research gap and examines the BMBF-funded labour studies as an example. It first presents the transdisciplinary research strategy and, in particular, the dialogue orientation as its methodological core feature. It then presents and evaluates the results of an empirical analysis of selected BMBF funding programmes, as well as nine expert interviews. Finally, it discusses possible modifications to the structural and programmatic framework conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuske Jessica & Becke Guido & Bleses Peter, 2025. "Transdisziplinarität in der BMBF-geförderten Arbeitsforschung: Eine Reflexion methodologischer Potenziale und Herausforderungen," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 34(1-2), pages 161-181.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:34:y:2025:i:1-2:p:161-181:n:1009
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2025-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2025-0009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2025-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:34:y:2025:i:1-2:p:161-181:n:1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.