IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v24y2016i1-2p87-104n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sinn braucht ein Fundament – Überlegungen zur Struktur der Anerkennung / Sense needs a fundament – considerations on the structure of appreciation

Author

Listed:
  • Fischer Ute

    (Fachhochschule Dortmund, Fachbereich Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften Emil-Figge-Str. 44, 44227 Dortmund)

Abstract

Sense is a multidimensional concept. It is based on subjective sensation within the act of working, and on the meaning of objective social patterns of acting. It can also be an expression of secure livelihood as a widely recognized normative aspect of social policy. Sense and recognition are not always consistent with one another. This paper focuses on the three dimensions of sense and reveals the incoherence of examples, where sensible and meaningful actions do not gain recognition. Based on these theoretical assumptions, the paper analyzes the capability of an unconditional basic income to solve that incoherence.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer Ute, 2016. "Sinn braucht ein Fundament – Überlegungen zur Struktur der Anerkennung / Sense needs a fundament – considerations on the structure of appreciation," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1-2), pages 87-104, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:24:y:2016:i:1-2:p:87-104:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2016-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2016-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2016-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:24:y:2016:i:1-2:p:87-104:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.