IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v16y2007i3p177-190n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Praxistheorie vs. Systemtheorie: Alternative Perspektiven der Beratungsforschung

Author

Listed:
  • Seidl David
  • Aaken Dominik van

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Zentrum für organisationstheoretische Grundlagenforschung Ludwigstr. 28 D-80539 München)

Abstract

In der theoriegeleiteten Beratungsforschung finden sich zwei zentrale Theorieansätze. Auf der einen Seite sind dies Studien, die im weitesten Sinne der Praxistheorie zuzurechnen sind. Auf der anderen Seite existieren recht umfangreiche Forschungsarbeiten, die sich explizit auf die neuere Systemtheorie beziehen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die beiden Ansätze gegenübergestellt und im Hinblick auf ihre Leistungsfähigkeit untersucht. Dazu werden die jeweiligen Grundannahmen der Theorien herausgearbeitet und bezüglich ihrer Konsequenzen für die Konzeptualisierung der Beratung analysiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Seidl David & Aaken Dominik van, 2007. "Praxistheorie vs. Systemtheorie: Alternative Perspektiven der Beratungsforschung," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 177-190, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:16:y:2007:i:3:p:177-190:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2007-0303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2007-0303
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2007-0303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:16:y:2007:i:3:p:177-190:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.