Author
Listed:
- Berger Thomas
(Duale Hochschule Baden Wurttemberg, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany)
- Hooge Ignace T. C.
(Experimental Psychology and Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands)
- Trivedi Pankaj
(KJ Somaiya Institute of Management Studies and Research, Somaiya Vidyavihar University, Mumbai, India)
Abstract
The use of risk maps is widespread and also mentioned in risk management standards. These visualizations display sets of risks by plotting each risk along two axes, representing the probability of occurrence and impact. Using an eye-tracking methodology, data on the cognitive processing of information from such risk maps were collected in order to examine why certain decisions are taken and what may influence their comprehension of this information. Data were collected from German and Indian participants. Those two countries are interesting for this study, as they differ greatly in several relevant domains like uncertainty avoidance or individualism. We found that individuals are generally able to perform a visual search task using a risk map but have more difficulty in making comparisons between two risks based on this type of visualization. The findings suggest that performance was related to cognitive reflection and that participants who reflected more on their decisions had a higher share of their fixations on target regions. In line with existing research, there seems to be evidence to support that cultural influences are at play when people work with risk maps, as Indians paid more attention to the context of the risk map’s target region. The influence of familiarity with working with risk maps was unclear, as there were some differences in eye movements visible but not for all variants.
Suggested Citation
Berger Thomas & Hooge Ignace T. C. & Trivedi Pankaj, 2023.
"Processing of Information from Risk Maps in India and Germany: The Influence of Cognitive Reflection, Numeracy, and Experience,"
Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 63-85, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:apjrin:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:63-85:n:3
DOI: 10.1515/apjri-2021-0022
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:apjrin:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:63-85:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.