IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/aelcon/v12y2022i1p1-23n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for Market Equilibrium – Comparing the Revenue-Expense to the Balance-Sheet Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Braun Eduard

    (Institute of Management and Economics, Clausthal University of Technology, Julius-Albert-Straße 2, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany)

Abstract

This paper combines the market process approach developed by the Austrian School of Economics with the theory of capital as worked out by the Historical School in order to provide a suitable framework for discussing the two competing approaches to financial accounting. Within this framework, it becomes clear that the revenue-expense approach with its emphasis on actually realized, historical transactions plays an important role in creating a tendency towards market equilibrium. Net income determined according to this approach provides information to the market on where there are gaps in the price structure. The balance-sheet approach, on the other hand, and particularly fair value measurement take market equilibrium for granted. Based on fair value accounting, an equilibrium could never be accomplished in the first place. Ironically, in order to be applicable, the balance-sheet approach presupposes the perfect working of the market process, including financial reporting based on the revenue-expense approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Braun Eduard, 2022. "Accounting for Market Equilibrium – Comparing the Revenue-Expense to the Balance-Sheet Approach," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:1-23:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/ael-2018-0024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2018-0024
    Download Restriction: Download restriction for institutions: For access to full text, subscription to the journal is required. Individual readers who register with De Gruyter Online get free access.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ael-2018-0024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:1-23:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.