Linear combination of estimators in probability proportional to sizes sampling to estimate the population mean and its robustness to optimum value
In this paper we have studied the gain of efficiency and the relative bias of linear weighted estimators over conventional estimators under probability proportional to size with replacement (ppswr) sampling for a wide variety of populations. The five number summary statistics for the relative bias and the relative efficiency over conventional estimators is given for different magnitude of correlation coefficients. The computational study shows that there is a considerable gain in the efficiency of linear weighted estimators over conventional estimators. To develop the confidence of survey practitioners on linear weighted estimator, the computational study is extended to see the robustness of the linear weighted estimator by deviating the optimum value of the weight up to 50% on either side.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 69 (2009)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Via Belle Arti, 41 - Bologna|
Phone: +39 0 51 209.82.01
Fax: +39 0 51 23.21.53
Web page: http://www.stat.unibo.it/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bot:rivsta:v:69:y:2009:i:1:p:59-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michele Costa)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.