IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bot/rivsta/v68y2008i1p85-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing Revisions In Short-Term Business Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Gismondi

Abstract

Timeliness is a driving feature of national economic statistics, especially in a short-term frame. In a survey sampling context, the current practice normally consists in a data release process based on a first preliminary estimate available for users within a short-time, followed by a final estimate, available when the data capturing process is considered completed. The number of preliminary estimates can be higher than one: for each of them the magnitude of revisions can be evaluated, on the basis of the difference respect to the final estimate. In this context, according to a model based approach, we propose and compare some preliminary estimation techniques aimed at reducing the average revision. After the definition of the optimal preliminary estimation strategy when the potential non-response bias is ignored, the case when potential differences between preliminary and late respondents can not be neglected is considered as well, with the proposal of a particular post-stratification procedure. Further, an empirical comparison among various provisional estimation strategies has been carried out on the basis of the quarterly wholesale trade survey carried out by ISTAT (Italian National Statistical Institute) for the period 2003-2006, aimed at estimating quarterly changes of the average turnover. Results show that a proper model specification leads to preliminary estimation techniques characterised by an average revision lower than that got using the actual respondents’ sample mean

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Gismondi, 2008. "Reducing Revisions In Short-Term Business Surveys," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 68(1), pages 85-116.
  • Handle: RePEc:bot:rivsta:v:68:y:2008:i:1:p:85-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bot:rivsta:v:68:y:2008:i:1:p:85-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giovanna Galatà (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dsbolit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.