IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boi/isrerv/v10y2012i1p95-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nature reserve pricing: yes, no, how? The case for the Darga river reserve

Author

Listed:
  • Nir Becker

    (Tel-Hai Academic college)

Abstract

Managing nature reserves often necessitates achieving mutually exclusive goals. Ecological goals, social and economic ones, can never be fully realized, and the compromising process should best be handled rationally. In this work, the problem of upgrading nature reserves and financing their operations is examined. A corollary to this problem is also explored, namely: what should be the pricing mechanism at the reserve’s entrance? This problem encompasses two dimensions: whether to charge entrance fees? And if so, how much? These questions are important in times of budget limitations, and our suggestion is to enhance the use of cross subsidization as a tool to minimize deadweight loss while keeping the budget constraint relevant. These questions were examined for the Darga River Reserve. In order to examine the viability of improving the park and its operation, both present costs and the costs of upgrading were studied. The difference in costs was then compared to the resulting difference in benefits. It was found that the upgrading process passes the cost-benefit analysis, as the added costs amount to NIS 531,000 and the added benefit is valued at NIS 4.8 million (based on the non-market valuation study presented later).The problem of financing was examined for both present costs as well as for upgraded ones. Four forms of monetization were then analyzed: free entrance, charging entry fees that maximize revenue, charging entrance fees that cover the costs of operation, and differential pricing. To this end, we have also used data from the Gamla Nature Reserve, in order to examine joint management and the potential to cross-subsidize between the two reserves. It has been found that upgrading of the Darga River Reserve can carry itself financially (i.e., with independent management). A fee of NIS 12.73 at the entrance could cover the added costs, as opposed to NIS 11.50 charged currently (assuming operation costs are met at present state). The reason is that an upgraded park will also attract more visitors. At the same time, however, financing the upgrading projects using entrance fees only will create a deadweight loss (DWL). Economic desirability versus managerial collaboration is then called into question. In the case of joint management, the DWL is minimized. That is, the surplus of one reserve, say of Gamla, will cover parts of the operating costs of the other, Darga. This cross-subsidization between nature reserves can bring about an improved state of nature conservation while minimizing visitor losses from the excess burden resulting from the improvement project.

Suggested Citation

  • Nir Becker, 2012. "Nature reserve pricing: yes, no, how? The case for the Darga river reserve," Israel Economic Review, Bank of Israel, vol. 10(1), pages 95-121.
  • Handle: RePEc:boi:isrerv:v:10:y:2012:i:1:p:95-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://boiwebrepec.azurefd.net/RePEc/boi/isrerv/IsER_10_2012_1_095-121.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boi:isrerv:v:10:y:2012:i:1:p:95-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yossi Yakhin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boigvil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.