IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boh/actaub/v8y2005i2p61-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of ecological and conventional agricultural

Author

Listed:
  • Jindřiška Kouřilová

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

Abstract

The demand for evaluation and following efficiency of ecological and conventional agriculture is nearly permanent and just clime to right inquiries from point of view: producers, processing industry, businessmen, institutions controlling these activities. Using of classical methods without any details and contexts, can say, that the gained results missing necessary credibility, which is most important to control the ecological agriculture, especially. The main reasons are for example very limited opportunities to change their program, possibilities because of various norms, laws etc., absence of processing firms (milk, meat, flour), kind of the region with its natural and society conditions, marketing. This contribution applies to some kinds of methods used by various authors. In the concrete classical efficiency in arable plant, pigs breeding, the market response, value added, milk production; perspective on welfare animals, regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jindřiška Kouřilová, 2005. "Comparison of ecological and conventional agricultural," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, vol. 8(2), pages 61-64.
    • Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:8:y:2005:i:2:p:61-64
    DOI: 10.32725/acta.2005.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.32725/acta.2005.024
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32725/acta.2005.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:8:y:2005:i:2:p:61-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tereza Šťástková (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efjcucz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.