Using the evidential reasoning approach in auditing of an information security management system
Audit information security management system (ISMS) is an important element of a well-functioning ISM. As part of an ISMS audit, it is also necessary to determine the audit risk. Various methods exist and are developed for risk assessment, both in practical and theoretical level. These methods can use quantitative methods, or may be based on a qualitative assessment of risks. Current standards (e.g. ISO 27001) for construction and operation of the ISMS remain on operators how to carry out risk identification, relevant analyses and evaluations. Various probabilistic methods or methods based on Bayesian statistics are widely used theoretical methods. However, currently there are no generally accepted methods for calculating risk. This is due to the difficulty of quantifying some events and often subjective nature of the analysis. In this paper, we introduce an evidential reasoning model (evidential reasoning approach under the Dempster-Shafer theory) for the information systems audit risk assessment. The advantage of this approach is the ability to work with indeterminations and subjective evaluations. The proposed model is applied to the assessment of audit risk in the chosen field of standard ISO 27001.
Volume (Year): 13 (2010)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budĕjovice|
Web page: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:89-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Šárka Steinová)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.