IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boh/actaub/v13y2010i1p67-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Composite indicator as tool of complex regions evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Tomáš Hlavsa

    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Gabriela Červená

    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

Abstract

Regions in the Czech Republic, the same as in most European countries, show in their rural areas a considerable difference rate from points of view demographic, social, economic as well as from point of view of infrastructure. The paper deals with a proposal of a suitable methodological approach of regions comparison at a level NUTS 4. A main aim is to analyze disparities among regions (NUTS 4) within the Královéhradecký region (NUTS 3) in light of agriculture and the situation in rural space. An identification and a subsequent analysis of these differences and a determination of a certain sequence of regions can be beneficial for definition of trouble shooting regions and better support aiming. Pieces of knowledge introduced in this paper resulted from solution of an institutional research intention MSM 6046070906 „Economics of resources of Czech agriculture and their efficient use in frame of multifunctional agri-food systems“ and IGA 200811170021 „Regional development quantify under usage of modern statistical methods“.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomáš Hlavsa & Gabriela Červená, 2010. "Composite indicator as tool of complex regions evaluation," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, vol. 13(1), pages 67-73.
    • Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:67-73
    DOI: 10.32725/acta.2010.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.32725/acta.2010.006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32725/acta.2010.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:67-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tereza Šťástková (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efjcucz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.