IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Environmental management - case study from South Bohemian rivers Stropnice, Lužnice and Blanice

Listed author(s):
  • Eva Cudlínová

    ()

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

  • Zuzana Dvořáková Líšková

    ()

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

  • Magdalena Hrabánková

    ()

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

  • Miloslav Lapka

    ()

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

Registered author(s):

    The management of water eco-systems on a general level is a part of a larger issue of the environmental management in a particular region. In the case of river wetlands, it is especially about the connection of the economic management of the area with the environmental management whose objective is to achieve economically sustainable use of the stream and river wetlands. To fulfill this requirement, it is necessary to find a certain ratio between the “top-down” and “bottom-up” management. The objective of the presented sociological survey was to acquire an idea of how the existence of the wetland and its ecological functions is perceived by the local population. In other words, it means they are social, cognitive and value orientation of the local population as assumptions of the “bottom-up” management. This survey was performed in three river wetlands in South Bohemia – wetlands of the rivers Blanice, Stropnice and Lužnice which were selected according to the degree of anthropogenic changes in the wetland from a relatively natural wetland to a regulated one. This survey was performed in two phases by using standardized dialogues with the total number of 300 respondents – meaning 100 respondents in each wetland. The results show that according to the opinions of the local population, it is necessary to increase retention of water in the landscape in a natural way, if possible. The technical solution, which uses reservoirs and which is the most often shown as reduction of the flood risk for the local population, is shown by the respondents on the last place. Acquired results show that the “bottom-up” management which takes into consideration opinions and experience of the population living in the region, can be more efficient and safer to the landscape than commonly applied “top-down” management. Therefore, it is necessary to provide space also for this management type in decision-making process about the type of the management of water eco-systems.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://ojs.ef.jcu.cz/acta/article/download/328/325
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice in its journal Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales.

    Volume (Year): 13 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 55-65

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:55-65
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budĕjovice

    Web page: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:55-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Šárka Steinová)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.