IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boh/actaub/v12y2009i3p119-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The most often screened criterions in questionnaire research

Author

Listed:
  • Liběna Kantnerová

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

Abstract

The paper shows results of the first phase of research for the thesis on monitored logistic criterions. The offer of criterions was satisfactory for the most of companies. On the contrary, a great deal of companies screened only part of them. Only some companies stated that they use some additional criterions, which were not included in the offer of the questionnaire. It can be a proof that there is no use of logistic criterions (especially in value criterions) in the work experience in the most of companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Liběna Kantnerová, 2009. "The most often screened criterions in questionnaire research," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, vol. 12(3), pages 119-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:119-124
    DOI: 10.32725/acta.2009.048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.32725/acta.2009.048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32725/acta.2009.048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:119-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tereza Šťástková (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efjcucz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.