IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Methodical differences of productivity indicators by international comparison

Listed author(s):
  • Martina Novotná

    ()

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

  • Tomáš Volek

    ()

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

Registered author(s):

    The productivity is possible measure by different defined type of productivity indicators with considerable differences’ in results. It is impossible to define, which one of definitions of productivities is the best. It depends on purpose and analysis’s range. For comparison productivity at the national level is better to use aggregates at constant prices, which show us the level and growth rate of physical product. For comparison productivity at the international level is better to use aggregates in purchasing power standard. This result is influence not only own performance, but also performances others comparison states. From the point of view employment, is optimal indicator for calculation of productivity working hours. This indicator removes differences at time work in single member states EU.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://ojs.ef.jcu.cz/acta/article/download/289/286
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice in its journal Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales.

    Volume (Year): 12 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 7-12

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:12:y:2009:i:2:p:7-12
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budĕjovice

    Web page: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:12:y:2009:i:2:p:7-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Šárka Steinová)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.