IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/reveco/v68y2016i1p160-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Computerization Of Courts. Implications Of The Judicial Management In The Assessment Of The Transparency And Accesibility Of Legal Services

Author

Listed:
  • MUSCALU Emanoil

    (Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania)

  • HULPUÅž Ioana Alexandra

    (Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania)

Abstract

The modernization and streamlining of judicial management involves major changes in information technology as well, in agrement with the new type of society that has emerged, the information society. Implementation of information technology in the judicial sector should be treated with due importance and considered as a guarantee that such legal services become more effective and efficient, more transparent and more accessible to citizens. The study aims to examine the progress in the field and the changes in judicial management down with the computerization of courts. It is important to investigate whether computerization creates prerequisites only theoretically, or in practice, there is a growing perception of the litigants towards the transparency and accessibility of the judiciary. Meanwhile, the study aims at identifying other important matters, besides computerization of court, that could influence the accessibility and transparency of judicial services.

Suggested Citation

  • MUSCALU Emanoil & HULPUÅž Ioana Alexandra, 2016. "The Computerization Of Courts. Implications Of The Judicial Management In The Assessment Of The Transparency And Accesibility Of Legal Services," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 68(1), pages 160-177, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:68:y:2016:i:1:p:160-177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/68111muscalu&hulpus.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    information technology; judicial organizations; judicial management; transparency; accessibility; quality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:68:y:2016:i:1:p:160-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard Alexandru Stoica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.