Author
Listed:
- Claudia OGREAN
(Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania)
- Bogdan Constantin PÎRVU
(Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania)
- Mihaela HERCIU
(Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania)
Abstract
The digital transformation of manufacturing SMEs is a strategic priority of the EU's Digital Decade agenda, yet technology-intensity-differentiated evidence on SME DT profiles remains largely absent from the literature. This exploratory, quantitative study analyzes needs assessment data from 71 manufacturing SMEs in Romania's Centru Region, collected through FIT EDIH. Following Eurostat's industry technology-intensity classification, firms are assigned to two analytical groups: high and medium-high tech industries (Group A, n=12) and medium-low and low tech industries (Group B, n=59). The study aims to provide technology-intensity-differentiated evidence on DT needs, barriers, technology priorities, expected outcomes, and anticipated EDIH service demand, and to generate actionable intelligence for FIT EDIH service design. Descriptive and bivariate methods – Welch t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson and Spearman correlations – are applied. Industry technology intensity differentiates DT profiles, yet planning capacity and technology identification (each cited by two-thirds of SMEs regardless of group) establish a sector-agnostic pre-adoption bottleneck. SMEs recognizing DT as urgent but not yet acting record the lowest technology ambition alongside the highest anticipated service demand. Anticipated service demand is uniformly distributed across DT approach stages. These findings support a dual-dimension intake protocol – assessing industry technology intensity and DT approach stage independently – enabling differentiated yet universally accessible EDIH support.
Suggested Citation
Claudia OGREAN & Bogdan Constantin PÎRVU & Mihaela HERCIU, 2026.
"Digital Transformation Needs Assessment In Manufacturing Smes: An Industry Technology Intensity Perspective,"
Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 21(1), pages 403-424, April.
Handle:
RePEc:blg:journl:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:403-427
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:403-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mihaela Herciu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.