Author
Listed:
- Hera KHAIRUNNISA
(Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Gentiga Muhammad ZAIRIN
(Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Sharifah Milda AMIRUL
(University Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Malaysia)
- Rida PRIHATNI
(Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Hasyim RACHMAN
(Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia)
Abstract
This study is motivated by the expectation gap over the role of external auditors in detecting fraud. External auditors are expected to detect fraudulent financial statements, however the findings of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) Global 2020 proved that fraud can be detected by external auditors by 4%. The preceding finding showed that the auditor's ability to detect fraud is still relatively low. Based on that motivation, this study aims to investigate the role of workload, time pressure, professional skepticism, and competence on the ability of auditors to detect fraud. This study was conducted by a quantitative study with primary data. Data was obtained through online and direct questionnaires distribution. This study employed convenience sampling by distributing questionnaires to external auditors who were more accessible in order to facilitate efficient data collection. This study proved that professional skepticism and auditors’ competence affect the auditors’ ability to detect fraud. Meanwhile, workload and time pressure did not affect the auditors’ ability to detect fraud. Auditors are responsible for ensuring the fairness of financial reports, this makes auditors act professionally and carefully, even if the auditor is under work and time pressure.
Suggested Citation
Hera KHAIRUNNISA & Gentiga Muhammad ZAIRIN & Sharifah Milda AMIRUL & Rida PRIHATNI & Hasyim RACHMAN, 2025.
"Unveiling The Auditor'S Lens: Impact Of Workload, Time Pressure, Professional Skepticism, And Competence To Fraud Detection,"
Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 20(1), pages 77-96, April.
Handle:
RePEc:blg:journl:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:77-96
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:77-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mihaela Herciu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.