IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/journl/v16y2021i3p60-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating The Organizational Culture From Romanian Private Companies Using The Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (Ocai)

Author

Listed:
  • DOBRIN Cosmin

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • DINULESCU Ruxandra

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • DIMA Cristina

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

Today's society framework is linked to qualities that might impact corporate organizations, such as competitiveness, globalization, market economy, and even economic crises, on both national and international scale. In this environment, a private business must follow current trends by seeking continual quality improvement of its operations to prevent stagnation. The goal of this research is to examine the organizational culture of Romanian private-sector businesses, as this is a unique feature that, if not managed effectively, can have a detrimental impact on a company's quality and competitiveness. The tool used for this research to diagnose the dominant direction of Romania’s private companies was the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI). Results indicated that employees would prefer a clan culture, more specifically, a place where people share the same values, and loyalty and traditions are key for a friendly work environment.

Suggested Citation

  • DOBRIN Cosmin & DINULESCU Ruxandra & DIMA Cristina, 2021. "Evaluating The Organizational Culture From Romanian Private Companies Using The Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (Ocai)," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 16(3), pages 60-71, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:16:y:2021:i:3:p:60-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://magazines.ulbsibiu.ro/eccsf/RePEc/blg/journl/16305dobrin.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:16:y:2021:i:3:p:60-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mihaela Herciu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.