IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/worlde/v49y2026i2p198-211.html

Institution‐Driven Comparative Advantage and Digital Trade: Evidence From Digital Legal Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangyu Zheng
  • Aihua Wang

Abstract

In terms of trade determinants, digital trade exhibits distinct disparities compared to traditional trade. This paper investigates the role of the digital legal framework as a new source of comparative advantage in digital trade development. Utilising cross‐border digital trade data covering 107 exporting countries or regions, 127 importing partners, and 8 industries in 2019, we empirically analyse the impact effect and underlying mechanisms of the digital legal framework on cross‐border digital trade. The findings reveal that the digital legal framework significantly enhances a country's comparative advantage in digital trade, thereby fostering cross‐border digital trade exports. Furthermore, we find that the digital legal framework facilitates digital trade by influencing institutional distance and lowering trade costs. Additionally, its effects are more pronounced in developing countries, as well as in economies with stronger contract enforcement and stricter regulatory environments. This study provides new evidence on the determinants of digital trade from dual perspectives of the source of comparative advantage and institutional drivers, offering valuable insights for enhancing the digital legal framework and developing strategies to promote digital trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangyu Zheng & Aihua Wang, 2026. "Institution‐Driven Comparative Advantage and Digital Trade: Evidence From Digital Legal Framework," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 198-211, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:49:y:2026:i:2:p:198-211
    DOI: 10.1111/twec.70043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.70043
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/twec.70043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:49:y:2026:i:2:p:198-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0378-5920 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.