IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/worlde/v49y2026i1p178-193.html

China Shock Versus COVID‐19 Pandemic: Which Matters More for Job Losses?

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Ji
  • Wei Tian
  • Miaojie Yu

Abstract

Studies have found that Chinese import competition (known as “China Shock”) and the COVID‐19 pandemic have caused a loss of jobs. Using state‐level panel data from 2017 to 2021, this paper finds that both Chinese import competition and COVID‐19 confirmed cases have had negative impacts on US manufacturing employment, but the impact of Chinese import competition has been larger. The findings are robust to additional controls and various specifications. The effects are heterogeneous by industry. Employment in the service sector has been significantly damaged by increasingly severe COVID‐19 but not directly affected by imports from China. By contrast, employment in labour‐intensive manufacturing industries has been more vulnerable to both Chinese import penetration and COVID‐19. The analysis finds heterogeneous impacts of the two factors in states with different economic conditions and reactions to the pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Ji & Wei Tian & Miaojie Yu, 2026. "China Shock Versus COVID‐19 Pandemic: Which Matters More for Job Losses?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 178-193, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:49:y:2026:i:1:p:178-193
    DOI: 10.1111/twec.70029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.70029
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/twec.70029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:49:y:2026:i:1:p:178-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0378-5920 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.