IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/worlde/v41y2018i12p3467-3481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade liberalisation and cross‐firm wage heterogeneity: Theory and evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Chen
  • Jinbo Hou

Abstract

In this paper, we first build a simple model with firm heterogeneity that features input and output tariffs in firms’ production decisions. We show that tariff reduction, due to trade liberalisation, has different effects on firms’ profit. Input tariff reduction generates a cost‐saving effect which benefits firms whilst output tariff reduction results in a competition effect which may hurt domestic firms. Given the fair wage argument, trade liberalisation may affect wages across firms due to the joint effects on firm profit. Using detailed Chinese manufacturing firm data from 1998 to 2007, we conduct empirical tests to investigate how trade liberalisation affects Chinese firm wages. In particular, we measure the joint effects of input and output tariff reduction by the applying the new measurement on the effective rate of protection. Furthermore, we also control for the effect of the iterated use of inputs with an index of a firm’s position on value chain. We found that from 1998 to 2007, Chinese manufacturing firms paid higher wages due to higher tariff protection when firms’ status on value chain was controlled. The result remains robust when more control variables are included and the endogeneity problem is considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Chen & Jinbo Hou, 2018. "Trade liberalisation and cross‐firm wage heterogeneity: Theory and evidence from China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(12), pages 3467-3481, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:41:y:2018:i:12:p:3467-3481
    DOI: 10.1111/twec.12722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12722
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/twec.12722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:41:y:2018:i:12:p:3467-3481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0378-5920 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.