IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/tvecsg/v111y2020i1p80-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Tale of Two Markets: Unequal Access to Private Property in a South African City

Author

Listed:
  • Lochner Marais
  • Bankole Awuzie
  • Jan Cloete
  • Mark Napier
  • Erica Greyling

Abstract

In line with international trends, South Africa’s post‐apartheid government has embarked on a housing policy that emphasises asset building. Homeownership has become a dominant policy for assisting the historically disadvantaged Black population. This paper looks at two property markets in Mangaung, a metropolitan municipality that includes Bloemfontein. We analysed property activity on 2,545 residential stands in former Black and former White areas in Mangaung since 1990. Our findings show two distinct markets. The formal property market in former Black areas shows a low number of transactions, low value and slow turnover. In the former White areas, a housing investment made between 1990 and 2016 would have yielded an annual return of 14 per cent, but in the former Black areas only 7 per cent. This poor return makes it difficult for homeowners in former Black areas to use housing for asset building.

Suggested Citation

  • Lochner Marais & Bankole Awuzie & Jan Cloete & Mark Napier & Erica Greyling, 2020. "A Tale of Two Markets: Unequal Access to Private Property in a South African City," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(1), pages 80-98, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:111:y:2020:i:1:p:80-98
    DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12367
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/tesg.12367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:111:y:2020:i:1:p:80-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0040-747X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.