IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v42y2026i2ne70024.html

Designing for Impact: Engaging Stakeholders With System Dynamics Models

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Kapmeier
  • Andrew P. Jones
  • John D. Sterman

Abstract

System dynamics models offer powerful tools for understanding complex systems and informing policy. Yet, their impact often falls short due to limited stakeholder engagement and poor implementation. Here, we explore how system dynamics models can be designed for real‐world impact by integrating analytical rigor, transparent modeling, and interactive stakeholder engagement. We build on the literature on engaging stakeholders through management flight simulators, gamification and storytelling, and utilize the C‐ROADS and En‐ROADS climate simulators and insights from the MIT Climate Pathways Project. To date, more than 492,000 people in 185 countries, including more than 23,000 leaders in government, business, investing, and civil society, have participated in interactive sessions with these simulators. We present three key design principles: (1) rigorous modeling and model transparency, (2) intuitive model interfaces, and (3) facilitated, interactive simulation‐based experiences. These principles enable users—from students to senior policymakers—to challenge mental models, explore trade‐offs in a safe, engaging environment, and learn for themselves. We discuss limitations and directions for refinement of these principles. The paper contributes to the system dynamics and broader practice literature by offering actionable insights for designing models and protocols for their use that catalyze learning and informed decision‐making in complex policy environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Kapmeier & Andrew P. Jones & John D. Sterman, 2026. "Designing for Impact: Engaging Stakeholders With System Dynamics Models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 42(2), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:42:y:2026:i:2:n:e70024
    DOI: 10.1002/sdr.70024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.70024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sdr.70024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:42:y:2026:i:2:n:e70024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.