IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v41y2025i4ne70011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trusted Simulation: Considering Model Quality in the Context of User Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Asmeret Naugle
  • Indu Manickam
  • Scott Steinmetz
  • Paul Schutte
  • Matt Sweitzer
  • Alex Washburne

Abstract

A high‐quality simulation model should help its users to easily and appropriately calibrate their trust in the model. Traditional evaluation metrics such as validation and robustness are necessary but insufficient for this task. Trust calibration depends on factors like the model's transparency, applicability to intended use, usability, reputation, and consideration of potential bias. This article proposes a framework for designing and evaluating system dynamics models by considering factors that contribute to the proper calibration of user trust. This framework takes inspiration from trusted artificial intelligence, broadening our traditional concept of model quality and explicitly focusing on what users need to consider a model trustworthy and to understand the model's relevance to its intended purpose. The trusted simulation framework can improve our integration of model quality activities throughout the modeling process, leading to more impactful and better‐targeted model design, development, and evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Asmeret Naugle & Indu Manickam & Scott Steinmetz & Paul Schutte & Matt Sweitzer & Alex Washburne, 2025. "Trusted Simulation: Considering Model Quality in the Context of User Trust," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 41(4), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:41:y:2025:i:4:n:e70011
    DOI: 10.1002/sdr.70011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.70011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sdr.70011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:41:y:2025:i:4:n:e70011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.