IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v27y2011i2p173-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science, engineering, and technology in the policy process for mitigating natural–societal risk

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy R. B. Taylor
  • David N. Ford
  • Shari A. Yvon‐Lewis
  • Eric Lindquist

Abstract

Increased societal risks due to the anthropogenic degradation of natural systems often require public policy action to mitigate. For example, increased skin cancer risks associated with anthropogenic stratospheric ozone depletion led to public policies limiting the emission of many ozone‐depleting substances. Natural–societal system interaction is complex and often requires expert knowledge and technology to develop effective and sustainable societal risk mitigation policies. However, available knowledge and technology are not always successful in increasing policy makers' attention to or understanding of these risks. The current work uses a system dynamics model of a feedback system that describes the stratospheric ozone depletion case to identify high leverage points for domain experts to influence policy makers in addressing risks posed by changes in a natural system. Model analysis suggests that the rate at which policy makers' attention to natural system risk is increased has a significant influence on the development of knowledge and technology and the ability of policy makers to mitigate societal risks. Copyright © 2011 System Dynamics Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy R. B. Taylor & David N. Ford & Shari A. Yvon‐Lewis & Eric Lindquist, 2011. "Science, engineering, and technology in the policy process for mitigating natural–societal risk," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 27(2), pages 173-194, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:27:y:2011:i:2:p:173-194
    DOI: 10.1002/sdr.456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.456
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sdr.456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:27:y:2011:i:2:p:173-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.