IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v79y2025i3ne70012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quasi‐likelihood ratio tests and the Bartlett‐type correction for improved inferences of the modified Poisson and least‐squares regressions for binary outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Hisashi Noma
  • Hiroshi Sunada
  • Masahiko Gosho

Abstract

Logistic regression has been a standard multivariate analysis method for binary outcomes in clinical and epidemiological studies; however, the odds ratios cannot be interpreted as effect measures directly. The modified Poisson and least‐squares regressions are alternative effective methods to provide risk ratio and risk difference estimates. However, their ordinary Wald‐type inference methods using the sandwich variance estimator seriously underestimate the statistical errors under small or moderate sample settings. In this article, we develop alternative likelihood‐ratio‐type inference methods for these regression analyses based on Wedderburn's quasi‐likelihood theory. An advantage of the proposed methods is that we have correct information for the true models (i.e., the binomial log‐linear and linear models). Using this modeling information, we develop an effective parametric bootstrap algorithm for accurate inferences. In particular, we propose the Bartlett‐type mean calibration approach and bootstrap test‐based approach for the quasi‐likelihood ratio statistic. In addition, we propose another computationally efficient modified approximate quasi‐likelihood ratio statistic whose large sample distribution can be approximated by the χ2$$ {\chi}^2 $$ distribution and its bootstrap inference method. In numerical studies by simulations, the new bootstrap‐based methods outperformed the current standard Wald‐type confidence interval. We applied these methods to a clinical study of epilepsy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hisashi Noma & Hiroshi Sunada & Masahiko Gosho, 2025. "Quasi‐likelihood ratio tests and the Bartlett‐type correction for improved inferences of the modified Poisson and least‐squares regressions for binary outcomes," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 79(3), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:79:y:2025:i:3:n:e70012
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.70012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.70012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.70012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:79:y:2025:i:3:n:e70012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.