IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v53y1999i1p55-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical methods for some simple disclosure limitation rules

Author

Listed:
  • J. Pannekoek

Abstract

To guard the confidentiality of information provided by respondents, statistical offices apply disclosure limitation techniques. An often applied technique is to ensure that there are no categories for which the population frequency is presumed to be small (‘rare’ categories). This is attained by recoding, top‐coding or setting values to ‘unknown’. Since population frequencies are usually not available, the decision that a category is rare is often based on intuitive considerations. This is a time consuming process, involving many decisions of the disclosure limitation practitioners. In this paper it will be explored to what extent the sample frequencies can be used to make such decisions. This leads to a procedure which enables to automatically scan a data set for rare category combinations, whereby ‘rare’ is defined by the disclosure limitation policy of the statistical office.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Pannekoek, 1999. "Statistical methods for some simple disclosure limitation rules," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 53(1), pages 55-67, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:53:y:1999:i:1:p:55-67
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9574.00097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9574.00097
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9574.00097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:53:y:1999:i:1:p:55-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.