IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v49y1995i1p63-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributional inference

Author

Listed:
  • A. H. Kroese
  • E. A. van der Meulen
  • K. Poortema
  • W. Schaafsma

Abstract

The making of statistical inferences in distributional form is conceptionally complicated because the epistemic ‘probabilities’ assigned are mixtures of fact and fiction. In this respect they are essentially different from ‘physical’ or ‘frequency‐theoretic’ probabilities. The distributional form is so attractive and useful, however, that it should be pursued. Our approach is In line with Walds theory of statistical decision functions and with Lehmann's books about hypothesis testing and point estimation: loss functions are defined, risk functions are studied, unbiasedness and equivariance restrictions are made, etc. A central theme is that the loss function should be ‘proper’. This fundamental concept has been explored by meteorologists, psychometrists, Bayesian statisticians, and others. The paper should be regarded as an attempt to reconcile various schools of statisticians. By accepting what we regard 88 good and useful in the various approaches we are trying to develop a nondogmatic approach.

Suggested Citation

  • A. H. Kroese & E. A. van der Meulen & K. Poortema & W. Schaafsma, 1995. "Distributional inference," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 49(1), pages 63-82, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:49:y:1995:i:1:p:63-82
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1995.tb01455.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1995.tb01455.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1995.tb01455.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:49:y:1995:i:1:p:63-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.