IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v35y1981i2p69-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is recreation affecting the number of birds' nests? A case study

Author

Listed:
  • GerlofTh. de Roos
  • Willem Schaafsma

Abstract

This paper presents some results arising out of the collaboration during 1974–1980 between an ornithologist (the first author) and a statistician. Attention is focussed on the question as to whether Tables 1 and 2 provide sufficient evidence for the existence of effects of recreation upon the numbers of oyster‐catcher nests and on the estimation of these effects by means of confidence intervals. The main tool is the standard theory for constructing conditional tests for multiparameter exponential families. The authors try to give a very careful description of the methodological aspects of their case. Many different probabilistic models can be proposed. Accordingly the statistical problems concerning tests and confidence intervals admit different mathematical formulations and (or) solutions. It is now apparent that, during their collaboration, the authors did not always make the most appropriate choice of models and procedures. They went through several stages before arriving at the choices which are basic to the sections 2, …, 5. By outlining these stages in Section 6 and mentioning the methodological errors which were committed they hope that readers will beware of similar pitfalls.

Suggested Citation

  • GerlofTh. de Roos & Willem Schaafsma, 1981. "Is recreation affecting the number of birds' nests? A case study," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 35(2), pages 69-90, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:35:y:1981:i:2:p:69-90
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1981.tb00716.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1981.tb00716.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1981.tb00716.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:35:y:1981:i:2:p:69-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.