IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v21y1967i2p161-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vergelijking van voorspelling en realisatie als bijdrage tot economisch bestuur

Author

Listed:
  • C. A. van den Beld

Abstract

A rather long time has elapsed since the predictions of the Central Planning Bureau were considered critically. It therefore seemed highly desirable to make a new study on forecasts and realization. The present article summarizes very briefly some conclusions from such a study. An important statistic in this context is the inequality coefficient, which presents a numerical measure of predictive accuracy. It is easily derived from the difference between forecast and realization and it may refer to one variable, to a group of variables or to each annual Central Economic Plan as a whole. It enables to draw valuable conclusions about the predictive work done by the Bureau in the past. Generally a satisfactory progress in the results is found, but on the other hand there remain some weak points which need improvement. Given the limited scope of this lecture reference may be made to the more elaborate study of the whole problem, published in Monograph No. 10 of the Central Planning Bureau, entitled: “Forecasts and realization. The forecasts by the Netherlands Central Planning Bureau, 1953–1963”.

Suggested Citation

  • C. A. van den Beld, 1967. "Vergelijking van voorspelling en realisatie als bijdrage tot economisch bestuur," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 21(2), pages 161-174, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:21:y:1967:i:2:p:161-174
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1967.tb00556.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1967.tb00556.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1967.tb00556.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:21:y:1967:i:2:p:161-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.