IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v43y2026i4p1657-1672.html

Using Participatory System Dynamics Approaches to Improve Community‐Based Oral Healthcare Delivery: A Case Study of the ElderSmile Program

Author

Listed:
  • Sara S. Metcalf
  • Harvey D. Palmer
  • Mary E. Northridge

Abstract

This study leveraged system dynamics approaches to improve community‐based oral healthcare delivery via the ElderSmile program. Insights and inferences from focus groups and key informant interviews with older adults and their service providers, respectively, were integral to understanding feedback mechanisms articulated in participatory modelling exercises. Twenty‐four focus groups were conducted at community sites with racial/ethnic minority older adults, and 16 key informant interviews were conducted at senior centres with staff. Annual one‐ to two‐day group model‐building (GMB) workshops held at partner institutions with project team members shaped the structure and scope of dynamic models simulating health promotion and care‐seeking behaviours of older adults. The GMB process involved causal mapping exercises that were conducted over multiple sessions and incorporated novel physical materials. Five new GMB participant roles are proposed for future study: disruptor, sceptic, spectator, convert and enthusiast. In‐person data collection and hands‐on exercises maximized participation and yielded shared ownership.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara S. Metcalf & Harvey D. Palmer & Mary E. Northridge, 2026. "Using Participatory System Dynamics Approaches to Improve Community‐Based Oral Healthcare Delivery: A Case Study of the ElderSmile Program," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 1657-1672, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:4:p:1657-1672
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.70062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70062
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.70062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:4:p:1657-1672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.