IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v43y2026i4p1507-1527.html

The Illusion of Progress: Understanding Policy Resistance in Corporate Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Luisa Díez‐Echavarría
  • Hernán Darío Villada‐Medina

Abstract

This study uses qualitative system dynamics to explore systemic resistance to environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices within Colombia's emerging regulatory framework. Through causal loop diagrams (CLDs) and archetype analysis, the study identifies key feedback structures that promote symbolic compliance—particularly ESG disclosure—over substantive action. The findings reveal three rebound mechanisms (RMs) driven by high implementation costs, reputational incentives and societal misinterpretation of reporting as evidence of progress. These RMs align with classic system archetypes such as ‘fixes that fail,’ ‘eroding goals,’ and ‘limits to growth.’ Colombia's case illustrates how well‐intentioned regulations can entrench superficial compliance, especially in contexts of weak enforcement and limited resources. Policy recommendations include linking ESG incentives to verified practices, strengthening due diligence and maintaining stakeholder pressure. The analysis demonstrates the value of systems thinking for identifying structural barriers and designing adaptive ESG policies in emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Luisa Díez‐Echavarría & Hernán Darío Villada‐Medina, 2026. "The Illusion of Progress: Understanding Policy Resistance in Corporate Sustainability," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 1507-1527, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:4:p:1507-1527
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.70047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70047
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.70047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:4:p:1507-1527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.