IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v43y2026i4p1331-1343.html

The Great Question of the State: Why a Country Is Resilient Even With the Most Incompetent Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Adilbek Bisenbaev

Abstract

This study analyses the paradox of state resilience under incompetent governance. The work substantiates the hypothesis that the resilience of political systems is ensured not by the efficiency of leadership but by institutional inertia, social adaptivity and societal stratification. A nonlinear mathematical model of the dynamics of state resilience is constructed, taking into account the factors of managerial incompetence, societal adaptivity, institutional memory and external stochastic disturbances. Numerical simulations are performed via the Monte Carlo method, and the phase transitions of resilience are analysed. Special attention is given to the role of the middle class as an attractor of stability, and the structure of ‘meaningless resilience’ is described, in which the state maintains order despite managerial degradation. Philosophical and systemic aspects of the phenomenon of institutional immortality are discussed. The key results demonstrate that state resilience can be interpreted as a function of the structural connectedness of society and the inertia of institutions rather than the quality of governance. This work reveals the fundamental mechanisms of the long‐term stability of political systems under conditions of managerial competence degradation.

Suggested Citation

  • Adilbek Bisenbaev, 2026. "The Great Question of the State: Why a Country Is Resilient Even With the Most Incompetent Governance," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 1331-1343, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:4:p:1331-1343
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.70004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.70004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:4:p:1331-1343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.