IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v43y2026i3p859-867.html

Spoiler Alert: The Wizard of Oz Is a Fraud: Systemic Musings on the Authentic Self

Author

Listed:
  • Victor MacGill

Abstract

Systems theory provides an alternative lens for understanding the self as a multi‐layered, recursive and autopoietic system. While the self can be experienced as a coherent unity, it can equally be understood as the dynamic interplay of subsystems and supersystems. Henriques' Unified Theory of Knowledge (UTOK) describes human evolution through four nested domains: matter, life, mind and culture, each domain transcending and including the previous one. Building on this framework, the present paper employs the story of The Wizard of Oz as a guiding allegory for systemic transformation. Dorothy's journey is interpreted as a symbolic mapping of identity formation, with her companions representing dimensions of the psyche: the Scarecrow as cognition, the Tin Man as emotion, the Lion as courage, Toto as intuition and the Wicked Witch as shadow. The revelation of the Wizard as a fraud underscores the fragility of socially constructed identity, while Dorothy's ongoing journey underscores the recursive and adaptive nature of selfhood. By integrating systems theory, narrative analysis and symbolic mapping, this paper offers a diagnostic framework for facilitators and theorists seeking to navigate rupture, repair and renewal in complex adaptive systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor MacGill, 2026. "Spoiler Alert: The Wizard of Oz Is a Fraud: Systemic Musings on the Authentic Self," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 859-867, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:3:p:859-867
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3216
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:3:p:859-867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.