IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v43y2026i3p1133-1143.html

The Viable System Model Through a Power‐Relations Lens: Towards a Power‐Aware Conceptual Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Nahed T. Zeini

Abstract

This paper aims to extend Stafford Beer's viable system model (VSM), a cybernetically grounded framework widely used for designing and diagnosing adaptive, goal‐seeking organizations. While VSM offers a robust basis for organizational viability, its limited engagement with power relations constrains its capacity to address the socio‐cultural and political dimensions of organizational life. To bridge this gap, the paper proposes integrating the VSM with John Gaventa's power cube framework, which reveals how visible, hidden, and invisible forms of power operate across different levels and spaces of decision‐making. The proposed “power‐aware” VSM enriches organizational diagnosis by combining structural and functional coherence with the relational dynamics of power that shape participation, authority, and adaptability. This integration introduces a power‐sensitive analytical layer that complements the existing VSM functions, strengthening their capacity to reflect on strategic, cultural, and legitimacy‐related dimensions of organizational behavior. Methodologically, this conceptual synthesis advances organizational cybernetics by incorporating critical perspectives on power, thereby offering new insights for organizational design, governance, and systemic transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nahed T. Zeini, 2026. "The Viable System Model Through a Power‐Relations Lens: Towards a Power‐Aware Conceptual Framework," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 1133-1143, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:3:p:1133-1143
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.70028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70028
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.70028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:3:p:1133-1143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.