IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v43y2026i3p1037-1056.html

Toward a Humanistic–Institutional Synthesis: Reframing China's Science and Technology System Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Qinwei Cao
  • Jinbao Yin
  • Jia Duan

Abstract

Why have repeated reforms of China's science and technology (S&T) system often fallen short of expectations? Prevailing policy‐centric approaches overlook a critical flaw that the systemic dominance of institutional logic has marginalized the humanistic logic essential for innovation. Using a mixed‐methods approach, this study identifies four systemic characteristics that sustain this imbalance: variation among actors, environmental unpredictability, multidimensional complexity and ambiguous objectives. Moving beyond diagnosis, we propose an integrative humanistic–institutional framework as a necessary paradigm shift. This model redefines S&T system reform not solely as institutional restructuring but also as a process that strategically cultivates human potential. By delineating clear roles for system components and stakeholders, our study offers both a theoretical lens and a practical roadmap for developing adaptive, innovation‐driven S&T ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinwei Cao & Jinbao Yin & Jia Duan, 2026. "Toward a Humanistic–Institutional Synthesis: Reframing China's Science and Technology System Reform," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 1037-1056, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:3:p:1037-1056
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.70009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.70009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:3:p:1037-1056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.