Author
Listed:
- Benjamin C. Ozumba
- David N. Ford
Abstract
Natural disasters damage infrastructure systems that support housing habitability, leading to population displacement. Recovery efforts speed up infrastructure capacity restoration and, thereby, rehabitation by displaced residents. Current recovery policy analysis methods focus on individual infrastructure systems or overall community recovery and are not focused on the impacts of built infrastructures on habitation. Many modelling methodologies are qualitative, do not capture the dynamic nature of infrastructure restoration or use single recovery metrics, thereby limiting their effectiveness for recovery planning. Rigorous modelling and quantification methods are needed to improve policy analysis and design. Using the system dynamics modelling methodology, the current work models and quantifies the impacts of realistic disaster recovery policies on habitation. The model is used to quantify and evaluate the policy effectiveness of selected disaster recovery initiatives derived from the literature in three performance dimensions. Specifically, it quantifies the habitation allowed by multiple community critical infrastructure systems, the scale of habitation loss and recovery duration. Modelled policies include increased resources, ease of access to public funding and accelerated administrative response to reduce process constraints in starting infrastructure repair. Results indicate that improving administrative response decreases habitation loss scale but does not significantly affect recovery duration. However, increasing accessibility to and amounts of public funding reduces the habitation loss scale and shortens recovery duration. The model structure is used to explain these results, which can facilitate improved analysis, identification of high‐leverage points and development of effective and efficient natural disaster recovery strategies.
Suggested Citation
Benjamin C. Ozumba & David N. Ford, 2026.
"Dynamic Modelling of Critical Infrastructures for Improved Disaster Habitation Recovery,"
Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 810-825, March.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:2:p:810-825
DOI: 10.1002/sres.3221
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:2:p:810-825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.