IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v43y2026i2p399-410.html

A Meta‐Framework for Organizing Transversal Knowledge About Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Robert Smith

Abstract

Systems science presents a rich but fragmented landscape of theories, principles and practices. To address challenges of coherence, comparability and integration, this paper proposes a meta‐framework for organizing transversal system knowledge. Grounded in relational theory and structured through the philosophical dimensions of fit, form and function, the framework aligns ontological, epistemological and axiological perspectives. Drawing on information physics, general systems theory and the concept of the relational holon, a matrix is developed linking core elements of science, ideas, frameworks, principles, assets and societal engagement to key philosophical categories. This matrix enables the classification and comparison of systemic knowledge across disciplines, promoting clarity, integration and critical reflection. The proposed framework aims to support the development of systems science by providing a coherent foundation for research, education and practice. It highlights knowledge gaps, reconciles conceptual tensions and enables synthesis across diverse approaches. Whereas this paper focuses on organizing knowledge about systems, future work will extend the framework to support systemic engagement and action.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Robert Smith, 2026. "A Meta‐Framework for Organizing Transversal Knowledge About Systems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 399-410, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:2:p:399-410
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.70067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70067
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.70067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:2:p:399-410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.