IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v43y2026i1p257-280.html

The Biased Interaction Game: A System Theoretic Approach to the Emergence of Inequality, Hierarchy, and the Implications for the Likelihood of Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Phil Mercy
  • Martin Neil

Abstract

The emergence of cooperation in natural selection has been successfully studied using game theory and, despite the underlying selfish nature of the evolutionary process, a spectrum of plausible mechanisms have been proposed to determine the conditions under which cooperative behaviour is likely to occur. Past work has shown that factors such as kin relatedness, proximity, group association and reputation influence the likelihood of cooperation, and a game theoretic approach has been used to define their primary mechanisms. Here, we consider two novel unexplored factors that play a role in determining the likelihood of cooperation occurring: influence, wealth or power of an individual agent compared to other agents, and the degree of scarcity in the environment. These two factors represent sources of bias likely to affect or prejudice the outcome of agent interactions in familiar ways such as those observed in economic markets. Our modelled environment, the biased interaction game, demonstrates how these factors lead to inequality, thus mirroring a social hierarchy in human society, and reveals how the emergence of cooperative behaviour is moulded by the interaction of scarcity and inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Phil Mercy & Martin Neil, 2026. "The Biased Interaction Game: A System Theoretic Approach to the Emergence of Inequality, Hierarchy, and the Implications for the Likelihood of Cooperation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 257-280, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:1:p:257-280
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3167
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:43:y:2026:i:1:p:257-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.