IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i6p1811-1821.html

Governance in the time of COVID‐19: Systemic implications for governing in an Anthropocene world based on experiences from Australia and Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Ray L. Ison
  • Sandro L. Schlindwein

Abstract

The disruption of the COVID‐19 pandemic reveals that contemporary governance systems are not fit for purpose as we progress our living in a human‐induced Anthropocene world. Governance failings of a cybersystemic nature are highlighted through a comparative case study undertaken as a systemic co‐inquiry of acts of governing in relation to pandemic effects in Australia and Brazil. Drawing on recent governance scholarship, key praxis failures in governing were revealed. The systemic implications were explored using a narrative analysis plus use of a simple diagnosis and design heuristic based on 14 cybersystemic conceptual elements. Arguments and evidence for the pressing need to institutionalise cybersystemic governance practices are presented, highlighting how they are critical to systemic design of effective governance systems. Considering that the human‐induced Anthropocene world and climate emergency will have similar patterns to the pandemic, the proposed design heuristic within a rapidly assembled systemic co‐inquiry process has the potential to facilitate dialogue and design for imagining and enacting new alternative governance systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ray L. Ison & Sandro L. Schlindwein, 2025. "Governance in the time of COVID‐19: Systemic implications for governing in an Anthropocene world based on experiences from Australia and Brazil," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1811-1821, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:6:p:1811-1821
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:6:p:1811-1821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.