IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i6p1683-1702.html

Punishment or reward? Environmental information disclosure in Chinese listed companies based on evolutionary game systems

Author

Listed:
  • Rongjiang Cai
  • Xi Wang
  • Tao Zhang
  • Nana Liu
  • Qiaoran Jia

Abstract

In February 2022, the Chinese government implemented a mandatory environmental information disclosure policy for publicly traded corporations. To assess the factors influencing environmental information disclosure, we developed a tripartite evolutionary game system model based on strategic interactions between the government, enterprises and the public. Afterwards, we conducted a simulation to examine the systemic interaction equilibrium among the parties involved. Additionally, we assessed critical factor changes in decision‐making for three stakeholders: initial strategy selection, related policy subsidies, regulatory penalties and public incentives. Incorporating Gaussian white noise into the evolutionary game model enhances the realism of simulations, allowing for a more accurate representation of how random disturbances affect decision‐making among the government, the public and enterprises. The study reveals that the active participation of the public in information disclosure activities has a certain degree of substitution effect on the government's choice to regulate high‐quality information disclosure by enterprises actively. The penalty mechanism is more effective than the subsidy mechanism. The public's decision‐making process is susceptible to the direct economic benefits that enterprises can gain from disclosing low‐quality environmental information.

Suggested Citation

  • Rongjiang Cai & Xi Wang & Tao Zhang & Nana Liu & Qiaoran Jia, 2025. "Punishment or reward? Environmental information disclosure in Chinese listed companies based on evolutionary game systems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1683-1702, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:6:p:1683-1702
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3086
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:6:p:1683-1702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.