IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i6p1465-1479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of systems thinking and system dynamics in managing risks and stakeholders in construction projects: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Zahra Ghamarimajd
  • Amir Ghanbaripour
  • Roksana Jahan Tumpa
  • Tsunemi Watanabe
  • Jasper Mbachu
  • Martin Skitmore

Abstract

This paper conducts a systematic literature review on systems thinking (ST) and system dynamics (SD) applications in construction project risk and stakeholder management over the past decade. It evaluates current practices' alignment with SD, addressing project complexity and uncertainty. Seventy‐three articles are analysed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, using descriptive, thematic and bibliometric analyses. Findings show fluctuating trends in ST and SD applications due to COVID‐19 in 2019, with notable contributions from China, Australia and the UK. Building projects are the most studied, employing mixed methodologies. Thematic analysis highlights SD's significant role in system representation and risk management, with 80% of studies utilizing SD models for various risk factors. While less common in stakeholder management, SD enhances communication and understanding of stakeholder dynamics. The study advocates for integrating SD modelling in construction management for improved decision‐making, risk mitigation and stakeholder engagement for project management practitioners, urging collaboration between academia, industry and policymakers for effective construction policies. Academics and researchers should focus on standardizing SD modelling tools, exploring hybrid methodologies like agent‐based modelling, and integrating emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) to enhance real‐time decision‐making capabilities. Collaboration between academia, industry practitioners and policymakers is crucial to ensure SD research translates into effective policies and best practices, particularly in safety and environmental impact assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahra Ghamarimajd & Amir Ghanbaripour & Roksana Jahan Tumpa & Tsunemi Watanabe & Jasper Mbachu & Martin Skitmore, 2025. "Application of systems thinking and system dynamics in managing risks and stakeholders in construction projects: A systematic literature review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1465-1479, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:6:p:1465-1479
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3032
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:6:p:1465-1479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.