IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i5p1404-1423.html

System‐of‐Systems Thinking for Complexity and Innovation—A Study Based on the Trajectory of Systems Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Chen
  • Jin Chen
  • Mats Magnusson
  • Bin Xiao

Abstract

Complexity and innovation are emerging as fundamental issues for the future of human life and society. To deal with them, different versions of systems thinking have been proposed. However, System‐of‐Systems (SoS) thinking, based on the biperspectival principle and human reflexivity, has not yet been clearly recognized. The unclear distinction between ‘systems’ and ‘SoS’ thinking often results in confusion and misapplication of related concepts within the closed cycle of ‘system ↔ system‐of‐systems ↔ complex system ↔ system’, implying a need to address a set of inter‐related questions: (1) What is the trajectory of systems thinking embracing complexity and innovation? (2) How does such a trajectory of systems thinking shape the future systems thinking in terms of SoS? and (3) What is SoS thinking? To address these questions, this article aims to explore the future of systems thinking in terms of SoS by embracing complexity and innovation, and delve into the theoretical origins of SoS theory, as well as its scientific connotation and logical framework. Firstly, the trajectory of systems thinking is outlined based on varying degrees of complexity across the dimensions known–unknown whole, and fixed–flexible relationships, respectively. Thereafter, the evolution path toward SoS thinking is analysed. Finally, the scientific connotation and logical framework of SoS thinking including (1) reshaping of boundaries, (2) governance of relationships, and (3) self‐reflexivity and innovation, are explained based on the co‐existence of paradoxes. The research results shed new light on the development of systems thinking in terms of SoS for complexity and innovation, by expanding the theories that integrate systems and complexity perspectives. Moreover, they provide practical guidance for applying SoS thinking based on the biperspectival principle and human reflexivity, along with a logical framework for engaging complexity and innovation at multiple levels of SoS.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Chen & Jin Chen & Mats Magnusson & Bin Xiao, 2025. "System‐of‐Systems Thinking for Complexity and Innovation—A Study Based on the Trajectory of Systems Thinking," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 1404-1423, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:5:p:1404-1423
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3217
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:5:p:1404-1423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.