IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i4p1294-1321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Symptom‐Based Medical Diagnosis Using Ensemble Learning Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Leila Aissaoui Ferhi
  • Manel Ben Amar
  • Atef Masmoudi
  • Fethi Choubani
  • Ridha Bouallegue

Abstract

Symptoms‐based health checkers are emerging as digital tools in modern healthcare offering patients the ability to self‐assess their health status by inputting symptoms and receiving diagnostic suggestions. These systems rely on machine learning models to accurately predict medical conditions based on symptom data. In this study, we explore the effectiveness of various machine learning algorithms with a particular focus on ensemble learning methods to improve the accuracy and reliability of health checkers. We evaluate multiple models—Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression, and their ensemble variations (Bagging, Stacking)—across three distinct datasets: the ‘Reference Dataset,’ ‘Cough‐DDX Dataset’ and ‘Cough‐DDX2 Dataset.’ Our results demonstrate that ensemble learning models, especially Bagging with Decision Trees and SVM, significantly outperform individual models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. We also tested clinical use cases and achieved excellent results highlighting the real‐world applicability and clinical potential of our approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Leila Aissaoui Ferhi & Manel Ben Amar & Atef Masmoudi & Fethi Choubani & Ridha Bouallegue, 2025. "Improving Symptom‐Based Medical Diagnosis Using Ensemble Learning Approaches," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 1294-1321, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:4:p:1294-1321
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:4:p:1294-1321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.