IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i3p629-639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Propositional logic, paradox, and Indian dialectics – towards a deeper ontological approach in paradox theory

Author

Listed:
  • Albrecht Fritzsche

Abstract

The article responds to the call of organizational paradox theorists to explore the added value of eastern principles of thought as a basis for a better understanding of the treatment of contradictory opposites in organisations. Drawing on prior work in systems theory, it presents a logical analysis of paradox based on the Catuṣkoṭi or Tetralemma discussed in Madhyamika Buddhism. Unlike its predecessors, the article reads the Tetralemma as an expression of a gradual process of detachment from the subject matter in question, resulting from a change of perspective. On this basis, the article is able to distinguish two different accounts of paradox in organisations, one resulting from excess determinacy and the other resulting from a lack of determinacy. For organisational practice, this means that the perception of and attitude towards values, routines, strategy or identity needs more attention in the study of paradox, which Indian dialectics might facilitate.

Suggested Citation

  • Albrecht Fritzsche, 2025. "Propositional logic, paradox, and Indian dialectics – towards a deeper ontological approach in paradox theory," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 629-639, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:3:p:629-639
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:3:p:629-639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.