IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i3p607-628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The intellectual endeavours of OR and systems scholars: The dynamic evolution of intellectual interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Ormerod

Abstract

In conducting their research, academics engage in intellectual work. To illustrate the dynamic evolution of scholars collaborating over time, the development and use of critical systems heuristics (CSH) is taken as an example; historically, CSH consists of an intergenerational chain involving Churchman, Ulrich and Midgley, each a highly productive intellectual worker. Twenty‐four published papers are selected to provide qualitative empirical data. The data was then examined using a theoretical model developed by the sociologist Randall Collins. The Collins model is developed from an analysis of a wide variety of intellectual endeavours and depicts the rules of the dynamics of intellectual competition between academics. The purpose of this paper is to develop a simple method whereby systems and OR academics can evaluate past research strategies and actions, and inform future research decisions, big or small, that involve qualitative (soft) or quantitative (hard) OR and systems thinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Ormerod, 2025. "The intellectual endeavours of OR and systems scholars: The dynamic evolution of intellectual interactions," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 607-628, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:3:p:607-628
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:3:p:607-628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.