IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i2p553-562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value Plurality and Multifunctional Commensuration in Organisation: A Systems‐Theoretical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Steffen Roth
  • Augusto Sales
  • Vladislav Valentinov

Abstract

This article aims to challenge the prevailing economic bias in studies of organised valuation and commensuration by exploring the broader plurality of values that organisations must manage. The article draws on social systems theory in the tradition of German sociologist Niklas Luhmann to conceptualise organisations as multifunctional systems of decisions that pertain to and commensurate a plurality values associated with a diverse set of value domains, also known as ‘function systems’. The utility of the proposed framework is demonstrated through cases related to carbon rationing and legal issues during the coronavirus crisis. A key finding is that commensuration is not limited to processes dominated by financial metrics, as political and educational metrics, among others, can also serve as primary drivers of commensuration processes, effectively guiding organisational decision‐making. The paper demonstrates how organisations can effectively commensurate diverse value systems without relying solely on financial metrics and concludes that future research in non‐/financial of valuation and commensuration will be crucial for developing more nuanced and multifaceted strategies and concepts, including multifunctional approaches to the formation, justification, and management of moral judgements and values.

Suggested Citation

  • Steffen Roth & Augusto Sales & Vladislav Valentinov, 2025. "Value Plurality and Multifunctional Commensuration in Organisation: A Systems‐Theoretical Approach," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 553-562, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:2:p:553-562
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3135
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:2:p:553-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.